K&N v RamAir filters

Technical discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
pablo
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 10:37 pm

K&N v RamAir filters

Post by pablo »

K&N or RamAir

We currently run a K&N cone filter on our car but have an option to switch to a RamAir foam cone filter. Does anyone have experience of running these foam filters on a turbo charged car, are they any good. Whats peoples opinions.

http://www.ramair-filters.co.uk/shop/au ... ir-filter/
Tntracing
http://www.facebook.com/Tntracing.uk

2015 - MSA Classic & Retro UK Time Attack Champions

User avatar
maff
Posts: 2382
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: Norfolk, UK
Contact:

Re: K&N v RamAir filters

Post by maff »

Not turbo charged but I had one on the clio and it made it louder... thats about it. Only ever arse dynoed so not the best review in the world, but it certainly did not change how the car revved or pulled to any degree, just more noise,

gary@apt
Posts: 1527
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 7:04 pm
Location: norwich
Contact:

Re: K&N v RamAir filters

Post by gary@apt »

stick with k&n, thats what i use,

ram air just ta's latest find

gary@apt
Posts: 1527
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 7:04 pm
Location: norwich
Contact:

Re: K&N v RamAir filters

Post by gary@apt »

Is your tuner always claiming to know it all and be 'amazing' at what they do?
yeah and he says stick with k&n

User avatar
jap.slapper
Posts: 985
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:55 pm
Location: On top of my Welsh mountain

Re: K&N v RamAir filters

Post by jap.slapper »

I haven't got a clue personally however I do recall reading a feature on a similar subject many moons ago, it would have been in one of the old car modifying mags (I think it was REDLINE before it ceased trading?)

It might be worth PM'ing 'Stav' over on Driftworks as he would have been one of the REDLINE staff at the time and to be fair to the guy he does seem to be very knowledgeable on technical theory compared to real world test results and might be able to shed some more light on the subject.

I would have thought that an NA engine would benefit more than a supercharged or turbo charged engine, but that would be pure guesswork mate (as clearly I didn't pay too much attention whilst reading the feature....doh!).

User avatar
pablo
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 10:37 pm

Re: K&N v RamAir filters

Post by pablo »

Gary, I feel like I've just been told off. Once Alan reads this he's going to punch me in my good eye :leaving: K&N it is.. :)

Thanks Gary.

Cheers Guys :grouphug:
Tntracing
http://www.facebook.com/Tntracing.uk

2015 - MSA Classic & Retro UK Time Attack Champions

User avatar
Bart
Posts: 1704
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 7:50 pm
Location: Chasing the Dove from Above
Contact:

Re: K&N v RamAir filters

Post by Bart »

pablo wrote:Gary, I feel like I've just been told off. Once Alan reads this he's going to punch me in my good eye :leaving: K&N it is.. :)

Thanks Gary.

Cheers Guys :grouphug:
yes I am mate :sifone:

I'm not a fan of the foam filters as even though they have the mesh inside them they still deform under high boost.
when I was at gordons we were mapping a Nissan pulsar and it had a foam filter on it and it and you see it trying to suck it in, we changed it for a K&N filter and it made more BHP and more torque much earlier in the rev range.

User avatar
jap.slapper
Posts: 985
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:55 pm
Location: On top of my Welsh mountain

Re: K&N v RamAir filters

Post by jap.slapper »

Did you stick with the K&N filter in the end?

User avatar
pablo
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 10:37 pm

Re: K&N v RamAir filters

Post by pablo »

Yes mate, I know better than to go against Gary's advice.
Tntracing
http://www.facebook.com/Tntracing.uk

2015 - MSA Classic & Retro UK Time Attack Champions

Post Reply