My Dyno

Show us yours....
mattie170
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 6:32 pm
Location: Norwich
Contact:

Post by mattie170 »

He got 312BHP at apt but that was in 3rd and sca did it in 4th. Thats where most of the diference came from. The main reason he took it to sca was to see the difference from last time it was rolling roaded, as it was the last place i took it to when i had it. At the end of the day its all about improvement and it was alot, well over 60BHP :D so he was happy

User avatar
Safety_James
Posts: 1295
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Snetterton Circuit - Track Safety
Contact:

Post by Safety_James »

amen matthew!! :grin:

User avatar
Stuart
Posts: 18080
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:26 pm
Location: Auto-Genie HQ
Contact:

Post by Stuart »

My car also showed 60 bhp at the fly difference when 'rolled' at APT and SCA, SCA being the higher (spec for spec) I can only imagine that are the normal sorts of issues comparing apples to oranges here.

Nice one Rob. Good figures in any event and thanks for backing them up as asked.
http://www.auto-genie.co.uk
07733 527430
stuart@auto-genie.co.uk
Valeting, detailing and undersealing

mattie170
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 6:32 pm
Location: Norwich
Contact:

Post by mattie170 »

60BHP was the difference between dyno runs at sca when i had the car and then just a couple of weeks ago not between APT and SCA. :oops: Now i'm confussing people...lol

User avatar
Rob_B
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 2:01 pm

Post by Rob_B »

well either way chaps...the car goes like stink...lol...cheers for trying to explain mattie. :grin:

User avatar
Safety_James
Posts: 1295
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Snetterton Circuit - Track Safety
Contact:

Post by Safety_James »

I'll vouch for that.. :twisted:

Post Reply