is this correct?

Technical discussions
User avatar
boxy
Posts: 1037
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:03 pm
Location: Saudi Arabia/Telford
Contact:

is this correct?

Post by boxy »

Was at the garage today and I heard someone ordering a tripple steel head gasket. After asking the owner what the hell a tripple steel head gasket was, he explained that people are usuing large head gaskets to increase the capacity of the cylinders. My question is can you get away with that without having to alter everything else to suit? I.E fuel, injectors and valves etc....
Trying my hand at web design!!

User avatar
duncan
Posts: 10897
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:12 pm
Location: On the podium
Contact:

Post by duncan »

would lower compression ratio surely and would need some other mods in my limited knowledge

andycaca
Posts: 740
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:35 pm
Location: Suffolk

Post by andycaca »

if you go OTT, it will lower compression ratio and retard the ignition timing.
i suppose its one way of restoring standard config if youve had the head skimmed quite a lot tho :)

he could have been talking about a triple layer metal headgasket tho, which is 3 slim metal gaskets, bonded in a few places. theyre stronger than the usual paper ones. i have a TTE one in my shed for when/if the head explodes on my GT4 :)

Image
Celica GT4 ST165 Sprint Special. GT3071@2.0bar

GTRJazz
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:55 pm

Re: is this correct?

Post by GTRJazz »

boxy wrote:Was at the garage today and I heard someone ordering a tripple steel head gasket. he explained that people are usuing large head gaskets to increase the capacity of the cylinders

The capacity remains the same but the Compression ratio will be lowered

TonyB
Posts: 743
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:49 pm
Location: Ely, Cambs

Post by TonyB »

If a gasket is thicker, lowering compression, it must also increase the capacity.
'05 Subaru WRX 300


R.I.P
'89 ST185 GT4
ONLY 370bhp & 405ft/lb @ fly
12.7s 1/4 @ 109mph in the wet
R.I.P.

User avatar
slaphead
Posts: 780
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 11:53 pm
Location: (WILD) West Norfolk

Post by slaphead »

I think the theory goes that the increase in capacity (above the swept volume of the cylinder(edit)) enables you to compress more fuel air mix into the cylinder - usually associated with running higher levels of boost.

Perhaps some of the boys running big single tubbies on r32s can advise?


~Mark

There's nothing that shouts "Poor Workmanship" more than wrinkles in the Gaffer tape.....

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 1037
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:03 pm
Location: Saudi Arabia/Telford
Contact:

Re: is this correct?

Post by boxy »

GTRJazz wrote:
boxy wrote:Was at the garage today and I heard someone ordering a tripple steel head gasket. he explained that people are usuing large head gaskets to increase the capacity of the cylinders

The capacity remains the same but the Compression ratio will be lowered
That baffles me, the piston can only go so far into the cylinder (stroke). So if the cyliner is lengthened then surely the capacity is increased and the stroke stays the same. Also surely compression will be lower as teh piston does not compress a smaller volume of air or am I talking bollocks?
Trying my hand at web design!!

BenTaylor
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:31 am
Location: Oxford

Post by BenTaylor »

Using a thicker head gasket doesn't affect the capacity, it just alters the clearance volume (and hence the compression ratio).

Since the bore and stroke don't change there's no change to the capacity :)

TonyB
Posts: 743
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:49 pm
Location: Ely, Cambs

Post by TonyB »

Surely that would be true in a NA application, where you are relying on the stroke to fill the capacity. But in a boosted application it is the boost that fills the capacity and this is down to volume?

Simple physics shows capacity = volume. Volume is increased by increasing the cylinder length, regardless of stroke.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume
'05 Subaru WRX 300


R.I.P
'89 ST185 GT4
ONLY 370bhp & 405ft/lb @ fly
12.7s 1/4 @ 109mph in the wet
R.I.P.

User avatar
duncan
Posts: 10897
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:12 pm
Location: On the podium
Contact:

Post by duncan »

isnt engine capacity

stroke x ((pi x (0.5 x bore diam)) squared) x # of cylinders

Post Reply