its not one of the H,M, T or T+
The HTA is awesome right across the board and sounds incredible too and is great value. You would not be disappointed with it.
STi Time Attack 2008 - new dyno figures !!
Bloody hell Duncan. Get yourself a four leafed rabbit's foot or something. Talk about crap luck.
Good job you're in Paul's good books or you'd be hiring a Fiesta for the ring trip. :-D
Have a good time and DON'T break this one :roll:
Good job you're in Paul's good books or you'd be hiring a Fiesta for the ring trip. :-D
Have a good time and DON'T break this one :roll:
Handle every stressful situation like a dog. If you can't eat it or hump it, piss on it and walk away!
- ScoobieWRX
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:42 am
- Location: Northants
- Contact:
That just leaves an S then...you haven't said 'not S' :lol:
On a more serious note...i know the physical difference between the std FPGreen and HTA, and the HTA only costs $100 more
but what's the difference in driving terms.
You've had both now so you're well qualified to say. Also how would the HTA run on a 2.0L STi. Gerry has the FPGreen and his goes like a rocket but he runs it on a 2.5L like yourself. I take it either turbo would be quite laggy on the 2.0L.
On a more serious note...i know the physical difference between the std FPGreen and HTA, and the HTA only costs $100 more

You've had both now so you're well qualified to say. Also how would the HTA run on a 2.0L STi. Gerry has the FPGreen and his goes like a rocket but he runs it on a 2.5L like yourself. I take it either turbo would be quite laggy on the 2.0L.
Buggers cancelled my op just a couple of days before it was due. Inconsiderate barstewards!! 

Waiting now for another execution date!!:headhack:


Waiting now for another execution date!!:headhack:
In my experience HTA vs Green they spool up very similar. I found that they can both provide 2 bar of boost at 3000 rpm if I wanted. I backed them both off to make for easier daily driving.ScoobieWRX wrote:That just leaves an S then...you haven't said 'not S' :lol:
On a more serious note...i know the physical difference between the std FPGreen and HTA, and the HTA only costs $100 morebut what's the difference in driving terms.
You've had both now so you're well qualified to say. Also how would the HTA run on a 2.0L STi. Gerry has the FPGreen and his goes like a rocket but he runs it on a 2.5L like yourself. I take it either turbo would be quite laggy on the 2.0L.
Peak boost was the same running to a peak of 2.4 bar in my tests. I did not run them at this level for long but backed them off to 2 bar peak.
Boost at redline - the FP Green tailed to 1.6 bar at redline on the 2.5. The HTA would hold to 1.75 bar and flow much more air. On a 2.0L I believe the std Green would hold 1.8 bar and the HTA slightly more if wanted.
I run the 8cm exhaust but on the 2.0L I would say the 7cm exhaust would be good for early spooling and through this I wouldnt think much difference in boost profile would be there.
- ScoobieWRX
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:42 am
- Location: Northants
- Contact:
zen
Was a long day and not my last one this week good to see you dunc buzzing about how my engine looks and should get it back late thursday or friday morn then drive it straight to ferry then over to meet you all meet lee on the friday evening.
You new techician at zen i here well done on all the work you did i was well impressed mate ....
You new techician at zen i here well done on all the work you did i was well impressed mate ....
lol Mark. Not quite technician standard (or speed) but I got it done and that was the main thing. Taking the MD off the other car, taking mine off, dissecting that and fitting the new one including adapting fittings to make them fit - I am knackered.
Your engine will be superb - I am sure it will do you proud :thumb:
Your engine will be superb - I am sure it will do you proud :thumb:
-
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:26 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact: