Andy_Cat - No more chances.....

ScoobieWRX · Post by **ScoobieWRX** » Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:13 pm

Scoobyweb wrote:
ScoobieWRX wrote:Don't take this the wrong way but i feel there are better ways to get your money and by now i would have gone down the small claims court route. I personally don't think this is the place to be airing your linen and it comes across as being a bit unprofessional.

I appreciate where you are coming from as i have been in this same situation a while back as i run a business. However, I wouldn't have wasted time writing about this on public forums when you could have gone legal instead and probably be on your way to getting your money back by now. I find the threat of legal action usually stirs people into action.

As much as i feel for you and the fact you have trusted someone to do the right thing there is a time and a place for this, but i don't think this is it.

Go legal!!
I,m pretty sure that there is no case to answer legally. Its is not a case of someone not paying for an item or service, they have been undercharged which is a mistake by the vendor. I do agree that Andy-cat should have done the right thing and settled and that after every other channel was pursued to obtain the money, he should be named and shamed. After all it is a shameful thing which he has done.

Chris.

Actually there is a legal case to answer. If a bank undercharges you for something, legally they have every right to pursue you for the correct amount, and in a courtt of law if need be. If the bank credits you with

Post by **Stuart** » Sun Apr 13, 2008 7:05 pm

Good response and info. I hope the guys get a result.

stockcar · Post by **stockcar** » Sun Apr 13, 2008 7:37 pm

not sure of the rights or wrongs of posting this on a public forum, but it appears to be a very straight forward mistake that needs rectified regardless.................

however, personally i know i could not be ar$ed to go 'legal' for something so trivial and would definately invest my time in far more rewarding things than chasing some idiot for what is rightfully mine - my time is far better invested in good honest customers

Gerry H · Post by **Gerry H** » Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:23 pm

I don't know the guy but, unless someone's actually told him, he may be totally oblivious to what's happened. If he's anything like me, I rarely look at the amount I'm being charged and only skim through the CC statement. Stupid I know but that's me :roll:

and just possibly him.

Christian and Beccy · Post by **Christian and Beccy** » Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:01 pm

Gerry H wrote:I don't know the guy but, unless someone's actually told him, he may be totally oblivious to what's happened. If he's anything like me, I rarely look at the amount I'm being charged and only skim through the CC statement. Stupid I know but that's me :roll: and just possibly him.

From my original account of the situation above, I have had 2-way conversations with his missus and he has had PM's on at least 3 forums. His other half told me that he knew about it as he spotted the error on his card statement.

Gerry H · Post by **Gerry H** » Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:04 pm

Christian and Beccy wrote:
Gerry H wrote:I don't know the guy but, unless someone's actually told him, he may be totally oblivious to what's happened. If he's anything like me, I rarely look at the amount I'm being charged and only skim through the CC statement. Stupid I know but that's me :roll: and just possibly him.
From my original account of the situation above, I have had 2-way conversations with his missus and he has had PM's on at least 3 forums. His other half told me that he knew about it as he spotted the error on his card statement.

'Nuff said then.

Andy_Cat · Post by **Andy_Cat** » Wed May 07, 2008 7:09 pm

Well fcuk me :x
I appreciate i owed you money Christian and i never said i didnt or wouldnt repay this amount.
However as Jayne stated i wasnt in the country for work reasons and had very little contact with her or anyone else for that matter.
I had to arrange for my company, who view me as a very small matter to pay my monthly pay into her account, just for her to live and attempt to pay the mortgage.
I then as soon as i knew i had sufficient funds in place gave her my card details to contact you.
When i get back im greeted when opening my mail with a northampton court summons!!
Nice... btw i spoke with a friend who happens to be a solicitor regarding this matter and she stated that their is no case :!:
It was an error on your behalf not mine, thus is the same thing as leaving a shop with incorrect change.
However i never refused to pay what i owed :!: :!:
Time was the mere request :!: :?:
Before people jump on the witchhunt bandwagon, those that know me i would have thought would know me better than that, guess not :roll:
I'm not dishonest never have been never will be and i'm appalled that my name has been dragged though the mud and my pregnant partner pestered and stressed out when i'm not here to defend myself fairly and fully. :x

rolty · Post by **rolty** » Wed May 07, 2008 7:27 pm

Nice to see you back Andy. Now that you are, I'd strongly suggest that any more correspondance between you and APT is done in private.

Cheers

Christian and Beccy · Post by **Christian and Beccy** » Fri May 09, 2008 9:33 am

Andy, I was WAY WAY more patient than anyone else would have ever been. With having had two-way contact with Jayne, I breathed a sigh of relief, but when she stopped replying to me, what was I to think? What would you have thought in the same position?

I let the early April date (3rd) that she assured me that this bill would be paid by pass considerably and with at least 2 warning messages and at least a week passing after this date before I went public. You/Jayne chose to ignore that warning, so what was I to do?

Whether or not it was my fault, we aren't your typical retailer, we are a tuning garage that is doing its best to look after its faithful club members and my repeated attempts to collect this shortfall in an amicable manner became tiring and time-consuming.

Anyway, the bill is now settled and as Rolty said, this is no longer a matter for public discussion.

Post by **Stuart** » Fri May 09, 2008 10:39 pm

Glad its sorted. Case closed