Mapping for Methanol in tank

Technical discussions
User avatar
duncan
Posts: 10897
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:12 pm
Location: On the podium
Contact:

Post by duncan »

The only downside for me on this is that my turbo will not physically flow any more air so no major peak bhp figures here. Torque should be nice though.

User avatar
duncan
Posts: 10897
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:12 pm
Location: On the podium
Contact:

Post by duncan »

Hmmm - I was wrong.

The turbo doesnt NEED to flow anymore air for up top power gains. It has to be a mixture of increased timing and oxygen in the fuel itself.

Anyway - for the purposes of comparison to before, these are wheel figures. The blue line was what it was doing before methanol using Tesco 99 on monday this week.

The red line is with 10% mix of methanol into the fuel tank with Tesco 99.

Tests done in 3rd gear with no weight/gearing/road alterations.

Image

To work back to flywheel figures:

16% loss: 377 bhp / 433 lb/ft
18% loss: 386 bhp / 443 lb/ft
22% loss: 406 bhp / 466 lb/ft
24% loss: 417 bhp / 478 lb/ft

APT's dyno worked out at 21% loss for my car which by my reckoning just tops 401 pub horse power.

Rnash2002
Posts: 644
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 12:05 am
Location: Norwich

Post by Rnash2002 »

So a improvment with just 10% mix,but did she feel any different??
Image

User avatar
duncan
Posts: 10897
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:12 pm
Location: On the podium
Contact:

Post by duncan »

Rnash2002 wrote:So a improvment with just 10% mix,but did she feel any different??
:smoke: :wack: yep :D

User avatar
rolty
Posts: 1224
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:43 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Post by rolty »

Awesome stuff Dunk 8)
George - Nurburgring pax lap whore and co-pilot extraordinaire

Image

ValoSunnyGti
Posts: 673
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 12:08 am

Post by ValoSunnyGti »

would this work in any car do you reckon, seems like it could be a nice solution to get the sunny a bit quicker, also is it just me or does it looks as though it was smoother in the acceleration as well??

Between 3000 and 4000 rpm it looks as though it cleared it and made it a hella lot smoother

User avatar
duncan
Posts: 10897
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:12 pm
Location: On the podium
Contact:

Post by duncan »

hmm - it is smooth but I think it may just be the ecu making readings peaky

kev@tga
Posts: 1158
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: norwich

Post by kev@tga »

good work dunk :thumb: dont keep playing with it to much you will break it :wink:
Matt Black Wrapped 2009 GTR with litchfield stage 4.25 :thumbs:

gary@apt
Posts: 1527
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 7:04 pm
Location: norwich
Contact:

Post by gary@apt »

dunc,you seem to have lost 40ibsft at 2500rpm

whys that??

maybe your dyno needs a calibration :lol:
Image
EVO 7 with 2300cc,GT35,HKS 272's,1000cc,MOTEC...the list goes on..

sdminus
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 6:01 am
Location: Norwich
Contact:

Post by sdminus »

Duncan. be warned when you start to lean on the methanol it will lean out very very quickly. The reason you need more timing is becasue of the increased burn time of the new mixture.

If you are running 10 % of meth in with your fuel the new stoich of the mix is 13.80:1 Depending on how the 02 is set up will depend on how safe you are !!

How high are your injector duty cycles ???

Keep a close eye on your oil !

If you are tuning with tesco 99 i would think the stoich would be differant to 14.7:1 in the first place !
"You think you have a limit, As soon you touch this limit, something happens to you; suddenly you can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct and your experience as well, you can fly very high."

Post Reply