I do not recommend Netgear !!!!

We don't spend all our time in the car.... honest
User avatar
slaphead
Posts: 780
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 11:53 pm
Location: (WILD) West Norfolk

Post by slaphead »

goodap wrote:cisco involved so must be good stuff!
What's that old adage

"All that glitters is not gold"

Cisco - good name in shifting data around offices

- but this is a different market - (which rather ironically Linksys have an very good name in).

I can see I'll get flak for this - so I'll go get my new crash helmet on :lol:

~Mark

There's nothing that shouts "Poor Workmanship" more than wrinkles in the Gaffer tape.....

TonyB
Posts: 743
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:49 pm
Location: Ely, Cambs

Post by TonyB »

I won't start talking about Cisco's superior security measures then :lol:

And as for Belkin - you must be lucky :wink:

there are many bits of kit that will do the job. You pays your money, you takes you chance. :grin:
'05 Subaru WRX 300


R.I.P
'89 ST185 GT4
ONLY 370bhp & 405ft/lb @ fly
12.7s 1/4 @ 109mph in the wet
R.I.P.

User avatar
Ben
Posts: 11608
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:16 pm
Location: East Anglia

Post by Ben »

belkin :) - think they work with magic - sometimes you have it - sometimes you don't :)
Dum spiro, spero
____________________________________

User avatar
slaphead
Posts: 780
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 11:53 pm
Location: (WILD) West Norfolk

Post by slaphead »

TonyB_GT4 wrote:I won't start talking about Cisco's superior security measures then :lol:

And as for Belkin - you must be lucky :wink:

there are many bits of kit that will do the job. You pays your money, you takes you chance. :grin:
I sincerely hope you don't start talking about Cisco and superior security measures - mainly because being an ignorant ludite I'd be asleep in seconds :lol: (I take it you've been on the Cisco course then?)

re Belkin and lucky mmmmm... - (I prefer to think of it as skill :rotflol: :roll:) more accurately - I have heard both good and bad about them - my personal experience is - very easy to set up - reasonably secure assuming you set it up right - and I've had no trouble - but hey - as you say you get what you pay for and Linksys have got a good name (with or without involvement from Cisco :grin: )

So I'm not disagreeing with you - just challenging brand assumptions :evil:


~Mark

There's nothing that shouts "Poor Workmanship" more than wrinkles in the Gaffer tape.....

User avatar
Ben
Posts: 11608
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:16 pm
Location: East Anglia

Post by Ben »

Cisco are the daddies in the networking world.

To security - 128 bit encryption takes about 10 seconds to crack with downloadable software off the net - I would recommend 128 encrpytion and lock down by mac address. i.e. when all your wireless kit is logged in - enable mac filtering and add the connected devices - be mindfull that you might not own all of the connected kit - maybe your neighbours do !!!.

by restricting mac address - you are only allowing your own equipment.
Dum spiro, spero
____________________________________

User avatar
alexb
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:31 am
Location: Norwich

Post by alexb »

murano3 wrote: by restricting mac address - you are only allowing your own equipment.
Until someone spoofs your mac addresses...

fact of it is wireless lans are not very secure :)

User avatar
Ben
Posts: 11608
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:16 pm
Location: East Anglia

Post by Ben »

True - when I do detect wireless I get at least 4 to choose from.

When I was at my sister's in london we got about 6 and at least 3 had no security at all.

P.s - you've been quiet for a while mate.
Dum spiro, spero
____________________________________

jonny_boy
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:07 pm
Location: Norwich

Post by jonny_boy »

I have heard good things about Linksys, I personally use a Netgear wireless router and my dad uses a netgear non wireless router and we've never had problems, however, my colleague at work has experienced problems with them and apparantly they don't like it if you're a fair bit from the local exchange :? they really should fix that (and other things) if they want to stay in the market !

Their wireless cards are pretty appalling too

User avatar
duncan
Posts: 10897
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:12 pm
Location: On the podium
Contact:

Post by duncan »

another vote for Linksys here :)

mind you I use Belkin PreN wireless network too and both work flawlessy with full security :) Mac address and 128 bit encryption.

I dodnt see many other netwroks around when I try to discover networks on my powerbook as i am a little way from other houses and normal wireless would not reach.

I can recommend the Pre-N though as i can now use the lappie anywhere in house/garage or garden at pretty much full strength... whereas normal wireless would drop out in the kitchen, be hopeless in the lounge, not a hope in the garden - so a waste a space. (on any of the 13 channels btw)

User avatar
alexb
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:31 am
Location: Norwich

Post by alexb »

murano3 wrote:True - when I do detect wireless I get at least 4 to choose from.

When I was at my sister's in london we got about 6 and at least 3 had no security at all.

P.s - you've been quiet for a while mate.
And even if you don't broadcast your ssid it's still possible to find it out. There was a great article on Tom's Networking a while back about cracking WEP encryption, it's depressingly easy.

I've been working my arse off lately, mostly in Bristol. No proper network access in the office, no wireless in the hotel, it's crap!

Cheers,
Alex

Post Reply