illegal window tints

323ian · Post by **323ian** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:57 pm

Was this in the Skyline? I am sure they was more concerned about the parachute and screamer pipe!! :-D

JC · Post by JC » Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:10 am

Surely if it failed the front window without any tint this brings into question the accuracy or valid calibration of the unit they are using?

JC

max1 · Post by **max1** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:54 am

MY POINT exactly but best not to argue with the upholders of the law as they can also give points on your licence for this and they also said my insurance would be invalid as this is a modification to the glass.

JC · Post by JC » Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:25 am

If the windscreen is as per the original manufacturers spec this opens a real can of worms.....

I personally would say that you are concerned, try to get them to re-test the front at least.

If it fails again then the car and every other one like it must too fail the test?

JC

Andy_Cat · Post by **Andy_Cat** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 2:35 pm

Amendments to Legislation During the early part of 2004, Section 32 of the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations will be amended to include

max1 · Post by **max1** » Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:31 pm

thanks for thaT ,i now have it as clear as my windows.

Richf · Post by **Richf** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:13 am

I will add I have the windows tinted on both my cars and although they look very dark its still easy to see though them even at night.

They are seen as public enemy number one at the moment , but certainly for motorcycle accidents the increase in the size of the windscreen pillars on some cars especially 4x4's and people carriers is far worse imo.

Ian (DaOne) · Post by **Ian (DaOne)** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:26 am

i got pulled yesterday, and they tested my windows, and they let 50% light in, and said i got to have a